Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 05:38:59PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Marko Kreen wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 03:56:39PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Currently, here are the options available for wal_sync_method:
> > > >
> > > > #wal_sync_method = fsync # the default varies across platforms:
> > > > # fsync, fdatasync, fsync_writethrough,
> > > > # open_sync, open_datasync
> > >
> > > On same topic:
> > >
> > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2005-07/msg00811.php
> > >
> > > Why does win32 PostgreSQL allow data corruption by default?
> >
> > It behaves the same on Unix as Win32, and if you have battery-backed
> > cache, you don't need writethrough, so we don't have it as default. I
> > am going to write a section in the manual for 8.1 about these
> > reliability issues.
>
> I think we should offer the reliable option by default, and mention the
> fast option for those who have battery-backed cache in the manual.

But only on Win32?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073