| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method |
| Date: | 2005-08-08 22:27:13 |
| Message-ID: | 200508081527.14080.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce,
> No one is every going to do it, so we might as well make the best guess
> we have. I think any platform where the *data* options are slower than
> the non-*data* options is broken, and if that logic holds, we might as
> well just use *data* by default if we can, which is my proposal.
Changing the defaults is fine with me. I just don't think that we can
afford to prune options without more testing. And we will be getting
more testing (from companies) in the future, so I don't think this is
completely out of the question.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-08-08 22:28:54 | Re: Solving the OID-collision problem |
| Previous Message | Marko Kreen | 2005-08-08 22:26:23 | Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method |