| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, kar(at)kakidata(dot)dk, andrew(at)supernews(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: The Contrib Roundup (long) |
| Date: | 2005-06-13 18:29:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20050613152827.L90456@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Jan Wieck wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/12/2005 8:03 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>>
>>>> Couldn't behaviour of REINDEX DATABASE not take that into account, and
>>>> 'skip' the system indices if not superuser?
>>>
>>>
>>> Silently doing something other than what the user requested ... I don't
>>> think this is the right way to become the most popular open source
>>> database in the world.
>>
>>
>> But, we are already doing that, no? :) I know I'm one that has been bitten
>> by 'DATABASE' != "all tables in the database" :)
>>
>>
>
> If we are, then we should stop.
sorry, I wasn't advocating that we do so, just pointing out that we were
... I like Tom's suggestion of following our VACUUM precedent, where we do
skip, but warn that we are doing so ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2005-06-13 18:31:17 | Re: [HACKERS] mirroring oracle database in pgsql |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-06-13 18:28:08 | Re: The Contrib Roundup (long) |