Re: User Quota Implementation

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Yann Michel <yann-postgresql(at)spline(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: User Quota Implementation
Date: 2005-06-10 14:07:59
Message-ID: 200506101407.j5AE7xn24039@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Yann Michel wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 09:45:32AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > did anything happen to implementing quotas, yet?
> > > though I did not see anything on the TODO List I was wondering what is
> > > going on.
> >
> > No work has been done on it, and I don't even see a TODO item for it.
>
> Do you think that it is possible that one can generate a TODO item out
> of the request or do you rather think different?

Yes, sure. Ah, I found it. TODO has now:

* Allow limits on per-db/user connections

That is pretty vague, but it is all we have so far. In fact, that
refers more to the number of connections rather than say disk space or
CPU. The issue we have had with these issues in the past is that we
aren't sure how such limits would be implemented or used.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shelby Cain 2005-06-10 14:12:28 Re: CPU-intensive autovacuuming
Previous Message Yann Michel 2005-06-10 14:04:09 Re: User Quota Implementation