Re: 2 articles

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Andy Astor <andya(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 2 articles
Date: 2005-06-07 16:16:22
Message-ID: 200506071616.j57GGMe20691@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Robert, Chris,
>
> > I think the article was accurate (well on this point anyway)... most
> > developers were, and still are, unaware of EnterpriseDB's interaction with
> > the community, so it seems pretty natural to me you wouldn't have
> > remembered much about them.
>
> Pretty much. It's normal for a pre-launch company to contact a couple of key
> Core members but insist on secrecy until they're public. In the US, it's
> the law (SOX). The only companies who have launched PostgreSQL-related
> offerings in the last 3 years which have been a surprise were Metapa and
> Netezza (and both companies have friendly relationships with us now, alougth
> only Metapa/GreenPlum has contributed to date).

Do we have any relationship with Netezza? If so, I have not heard it.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2005-06-07 16:20:59 Re: 2 articles
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-06-07 16:13:41 Re: 2 articles