Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Held <dave(dot)held(at)arraysg(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased
Date: 2005-05-02 18:35:33
Message-ID: 20050502153308.K53065@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2 May 2005, Josh Berkus wrote:

> As you've already observed, if Tom doesn't like something it's very unlikely
> to get through.

One thing to note on this one ... I've never seen Tom *not* try and help
the submitter to get the code up to spec either ... he's always bent over
backwards to try and help set someone on the right path if the patch
submission warrants it ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-02 18:38:57 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-05-02 18:20:34 Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-05-02 18:37:04 Re: pg_locks needs a facelift
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-05-02 18:30:03 Re: Cleaning up unreferenced table files