Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not?
Date: 2004-12-06 00:18:22
Message-ID: 200412060018.iB60IMv13876@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I'm sorry if I offended you.
>
> As for suggestions, elsewhere you wrote:
>
> "Now, if I don't understand the patch, we can change the procedure so I
> require someone to state it is OK rather than the fallback of quiet
> acceptance, especially just before a beta or RC version."
>
>
> Take that as my suggested improvement.

Yes, that is what I am thinking, though I am hoping someone who
understands encodings will take ownership of all those patches like
Peter did with translations. If I don't understand it even simple
things can go wrong with patch application.

> Keep up the good work as always - you know we are grateful for it.

Thanks.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message elein 2004-12-06 00:18:49 Re: rules, triggers and views
Previous Message Andrew - Supernews 2004-12-06 00:13:02 Re: rules, triggers and views