| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 |
| Date: | 2004-10-04 18:55:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20041004185521.GR1297@decibel.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
While we're discussing things that will possibly mean a different system
than the current function language, I have another request: Can we have
a means of defining procedures/functions that doesn't involve using
quotes? Having to double-quote everything is extremely annoying and
prone to errors. I realize that even if procedures/functions aren't
defined using quotes there will still be cases where things need to be
multi-quoted, but those cases are much rarer.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-10-04 19:01:12 | Re: open item: tablespace handing in pg_dump/pg_restore |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2004-10-04 18:42:43 | Re: FunctionCall2 performance |