Re: WIN1250 as server encoding

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIN1250 as server encoding
Date: 2004-09-15 16:28:06
Message-ID: 200409151828.06423.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> AFAIR, the only place where these numbers are stored is in
> pg_database.datencoding, so only the server-encoding values are
> frozen in any meaningful sense. You could rearrange the numbers
> currently assigned to client encodings to preserve the range
> property.

Interesting. I guess I was too traumatized by the last numbering change
to ignore that possibility. Does anyone else see a problem with that?

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Wong 2004-09-15 16:28:32 some PITR performance data with DBT-2
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-09-15 16:26:59 Re: banner vs version