Re: Release planning

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Release planning
Date: 2004-07-14 20:03:09
Message-ID: 200407142003.i6EK39k04601@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > The community decides when to stop development. Neither Afilias nor any
> > other company has that control. If you want the development cycle cut
> > shorter, make your case to the community --- if you win, great, if not,
> > don't gripe about it.
>
> Core decides when to stop development ... that is what cores role is ...
> to *steer* the development of the code ... the community didn't decide to
> extend the dev cycle this time, any more then it has in the past ... core
> decided to ... period. end of story.
>

Not for me. I think core picks specific dates for release because it is
too hard to get concensus quickly on dates, but the community is
certainly involved in the setting of development cycles.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2004-07-14 20:38:40 Re: Point in Time Recovery
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-14 20:02:02 Re: Release planning (was: Re: Status report)