| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | Klaus Naumann <kn(at)mgnet(dot)de>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jharris(at)tvi(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: User Quota Implementation |
| Date: | 2004-07-09 16:50:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20040709165021.GJ21419@ns.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Rod Taylor (pg(at)rbt(dot)ca) wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-07-09 at 11:47, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Klaus Naumann (kn(at)mgnet(dot)de) wrote:
> > > On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> > > > 3. The maximum quota size is (currently) the maximum of int4*1024 bytes.
> > >
> > > why is this? This is very limiting ...
> >
> > It's 2TB...
>
> Okay.. that is good for a few years. What do we do after 2007?
I was pointing out that it's not all *that* limiting. If it's not too
difficult (ie: isn't something that affects disk layout or internal
postgres things..) I certainly don't have a problem w/ moving to a 64bit
int.
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2004-07-09 16:59:50 | Re: User Quota Implementation |
| Previous Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2004-07-09 16:45:50 | Re: User Quota Implementation |