| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jharris(at)tvi(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: User Quota Implementation |
| Date: | 2004-07-09 16:36:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20040709163616.GB25233@dcc.uchile.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 10:04:01AM -0600, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> I'd like to make the following changes... Let me know your thoughts.
>
> - userquota is stored in units of kilobytes... is this adequate? Would
> anyone ever use a quota < 1K other than for allowing a user no space?
> If the user has no space, why not just disable the account and/or make
> them read-only?
We don't have the functionality for read-only, unless you REVOKE all his
privileges except select.
Anyway I think that you can't really enforce with such granularity, so
this is moot.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"La felicidad no es mañana. La felicidad es ahora"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2004-07-09 16:44:39 | Re: User Quota Implementation |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-07-09 16:32:52 | Re: User Quota Implementation |