Re: Performance Issues in 7.4.3

From: Markus Schaber <schabios(at)logi-track(dot)com>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: Jim Ewert <jim(dot)ewert(at)excite(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance Issues in 7.4.3
Date: 2004-07-01 10:03:29
Message-ID: 20040701120329.2a78fac3@kingfisher.intern.logi-track.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Hi,

On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:30:07 -0500 (EST)
Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> wrote:

> > My previous post about slow updates w/ 7.4.2 needed a multi-column
> > index to get speed comparable to Sybase. When I went to 7.4.3
> > (Slackware 9.1) w/ JDBC, the improvements are that it doesn't
> > initially take much memory(have 512M) and didn't swap. I ran a full
> > vaccum and a cluster, however speed degaded to 1 *second* / update
> > of one row in 150 rows of data, within a day! pg_autovacuum now
> > gives excellent performance. What happened?
>
> This is not a jdbc question and is probably more appropriate for the
> -general list.

There also is a pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org mailing list
specifically for performance questions.

HTH,
Markus

--
markus schaber | dipl. informatiker
logi-track ag | rennweg 14-16 | ch 8001 zürich
phone +41-43-888 62 52 | fax +41-43-888 62 53
mailto:schabios(at)logi-track(dot)com | www.logi-track.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Jowett 2004-07-01 11:20:58 Re: Query was cancelled - reason?
Previous Message Guido Fiala 2004-07-01 08:53:00 Query was cancelled - reason?