Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
Date: 2004-05-17 04:53:19
Message-ID: 20040517015055.F52585@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 17 May 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 May 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > I personally don't think Win32 is enough of a new feature either, but
> > > others disagree.
> >
> > Jan, correct me if I'm wrong ... Jan's point is that we have enough
> > already to warrant a beta on June 1st, even without Win32 ... Win32 (or
> > any of the other stuff, like PITR/tablespaces) would be icing on the cake
> > ...
>
> I disagree we have enough new features for a release, even with Win32.
> Our features are getting more complex and require more time to develop.

Not true ... you just have to fix your definition of what a feature is ...
a feature is an improvement to the system, whether it be new
functionality, or improved performance ... I consider the work Tom did on
the IN performance in 7.4 to have been a major feature, considering that
it made use of it *alot* more effective ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-05-17 05:00:59 Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-05-17 04:50:20 Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion