Re: socket calls in signal handler (WAS: APC + socket restrictions un der Win32?)

From: Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be>
To: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, 'Magnus Hagander' <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Subject: Re: socket calls in signal handler (WAS: APC + socket restrictions un der Win32?)
Date: 2004-03-08 18:12:00
Message-ID: 20040308181200.GA4173@ping.be
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 09:12:52PM +1100, Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Was just discussing the issues related to the above off list with Magnus:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers-win32/2004-03/msg00041.php
>
> Whilst we can think of a number of work-arounds (the simplest being a
> suggestion by Magnus: set a flag, like APCcalled, to false before the
> select() call, and repeat the select() if APCcalled == true on return from
> select), we were wondering if having socket calls inside signal handlers was
> a good idea in any case?

Is this a win32 only thing, or is it more general?

OpenBSD for instance has some documentation on which functions
are safe to be called from a signal handler, and socket
operations aren't part of it. See for isntance their manpages
about signal and sigaction.

Kurt

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-08 18:28:46 Re: raising the default default_statistics_target
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-03-08 18:08:32 Re: raising the default default_statistics_target