Re: Tablespaces

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Swan <tswan(at)idigx(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tablespaces
Date: 2004-03-04 02:41:17
Message-ID: 200403040241.i242fHI05299@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32

Thomas Swan wrote:
> >The advantage of symlinks is that an administrator could see how things
> >are laid out from the command line.
> >
> >
> >
> That's a poor reason to require symlinks. The administrator can just as
> easily open up psql and query pg_tablespace to see that same
> information. Besides, the postgres doesn't know where to look on the
> filesystem for the /path/to/oid without a system catalog lookup. There
> doesn't seem to be any sensible reason to force a filesystem requirement
> when the core operations are diffferent to begin with.
>
> If a more global view of all databases is necessary, perhaps there ought
> to be a system wide view which could display all of that information at
> once: dbname, relation name, and physical location.

Who doesn't have symlinks these days, and is going to be using
tablespaces? Even Win32 has them.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-04 03:11:11 7.4.2 branding
Previous Message Thomas Swan 2004-03-04 02:31:16 Re: Tablespaces

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-03-04 04:14:51 Re: Tablespaces
Previous Message Thomas Swan 2004-03-04 02:31:16 Re: Tablespaces