Re: Comments on patch for date_trunc( 'week', ... );

From: Robert Creager <Robert_Creager(at)LogicalChaos(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Comments on patch for date_trunc( 'week', ... );
Date: 2004-03-04 03:46:36
Message-ID: 20040303204636.50ac97e5.Robert_Creager@LogicalChaos.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

--Multipart_Wed__3_Mar_2004_20_46_36_-0700_wDLTPczSDtMG+=.x
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

When grilled further on (Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:40:50 -0500 (EST)),
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> confessed:

>
> Well, it must have hit the lists if I have put it in the patch queue, no?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hey Bruce,
>
> I never saw the patch hit the hackers list. Did any of you smart folks take a
> look at it?
>

More emphasis on the latter, less on the former. That was the gist of the
e-mail, to make sure someone else actually looked at it ;-)

Later,
Rob

--
20:44:41 up 18 days, 4:22, 3 users, load average: 1.04, 1.12, 1.15
Linux 2.4.21-0.13_test #60 SMP Sun Dec 7 17:00:02 MST 2003

--Multipart_Wed__3_Mar_2004_20_46_36_-0700_wDLTPczSDtMG+=.x
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkBGpqMACgkQLQ/DKuwDYzneugCfRGzomc0UtuHjqwn+lCTwg7yN
mQEAmwQ7tpPCBSR/xAhqP+OGdbzwRJ+R
=ePnf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Multipart_Wed__3_Mar_2004_20_46_36_-0700_wDLTPczSDtMG+=.x--

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-03-04 04:14:51 Re: Tablespaces
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-04 03:40:50 Re: Comments on patch for date_trunc( 'week', ... );