Re: Reduced power consumption in autovacuum launcher process

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reduced power consumption in autovacuum launcher process
Date: 2011-08-10 00:35:38
Message-ID: 20038.1312936538@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 9 August 2011 23:07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Now that I've got the WaitLatch code fully swapped into my head,
>> I'm thinking of pushing on to review/commit this patch of Peter's.

> Thanks for giving this your attention. I had already planned to
> produce a new revision this weekend, so I'd appreciate it if you could
> hold off until Sunday or Monday.

Actually, I'm nearly done with it already. Perhaps you could start
thinking about the other polling loops.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter van Hardenberg 2011-08-10 01:00:42 Re: Policy on pulling in code from other projects?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-08-10 00:00:32 Re: augmenting MultiXacts to improve foreign keys