Re: [HACKERS] PL/Java issues

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PL/Java issues
Date: 2003-12-31 23:47:49
Message-ID: 200312312347.hBVNloD00529@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

Jan Wieck wrote:
> As an example, if a PL/Java trigger on the order header executes an SPI
> query on the order lines, a trigger on the order line (also in PL/Java)
> might now want to call a method on it's parent object (the order header
> that is waiting for the SPI result set). This should NOT result in
> another OH instance being created for the same logical OH.
>
> Probably it is not possible to map these things automatically while
> keeping the system flexible enough to be usefull. But is it feasable to
> require the programmer to provide glue code for every procedure that
> does all these things? How does Oracle attack this problem?

How do our other procedural languages handle this problem? Are none of
the OO or interface via OO?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-12-31 23:52:57 Re: Block-level CRC checks
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-12-31 21:59:36 Re: using stp for dbt2 + postgresql

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barry Lind 2004-01-01 00:34:51 Re: [HACKERS] PL/Java issues
Previous Message Oliver Jowett 2003-12-31 23:40:29 Re: Drop support for jdk 1.1, 1.2 ?