Re: Build farm

From: Jean-Michel POURE <jm(at)poure(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Build farm
Date: 2003-11-24 09:14:48
Message-ID: 200311241014.48813.jm@poure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Le Vendredi 21 Novembre 2003 19:47, Tom Lane a écrit :
> I think the main value of a build farm is that we'd get nearly immediate
> feedback about the majority of simple porting problems.  Your previous
> arguments that it wouldn't smoke everything out are certainly valid ---
> but we wouldn't abandon the regression tests just because they don't
> find everything.  Immediate feedback is good because a patch can be
> fixed while it's still fresh in the author's mind.

Dear friends,

We have a small build farm for pgAdmin covering Win32, FreeBSD and most GNU/
Linux systems. See http://www.pgadmin.org/pgadmin3/download.php#snapshots

The advantage are immediate feedback and correction of problems. Also, in a
release cycle, developers and translators are quite motivated to see their
work published fast.

Of course, it is always hard to "mesure" the real impact of a build farm. My
opinion it that it is quite positive, as it helps tighten the links between
people, which is free software is mostly about.

Cheers,
Jean-Michel Pouré

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 2003-11-24 11:16:22 Re: Sponsoring enterprise features
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-11-24 06:36:57 Re: Executable files in CVS

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-11-24 12:55:01 Re: Build farm
Previous Message Robert Treat 2003-11-23 17:24:29 Re: New Event