Re: Release cycle length

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Release cycle length
Date: 2003-11-18 00:24:21
Message-ID: 20031117202346.M731@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> The time from release 7.3 to release 7.4 was 355 days, an all-time high.
> We really need to shorten that. We already have a number of significant
> improvements in 7.5 now, and several good ones coming up in the next few
> weeks. We cannot let people wait 1 year for that. I suggest that we aim
> for a 6 month cycle, consisting of approximately 4 months of development
> and 2 months of cleanup. So the start of the next beta could be the 1st
> of March. What do you think?

That is the usual goal *nod* Same goal we try for each release, and never
quite seem to get there ... we'll try 'yet again' with v7.5 though, as we
always do :)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-11-18 00:37:20 Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-17 23:53:50 Re: Background writer process

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-11-18 00:44:48 Re: Release cycle length
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-11-17 23:46:38 Release cycle length