From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alexey Borzov <borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point? |
Date: | 2003-09-15 16:39:19 |
Message-ID: | 200309150939.19008.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Alexey, Ian,
> There are 2 sorts of people using MySQL:
> 1) Those who know several RDBMSs and use it only when it is the best
> tool for the job (read-only web DB, storing logs, etc)
> 2) Those who know only MySQL and think that it is the Ultimate Solution
> for Everything.
Actually, for Comdex, I'm concerned about:
3) Management who know nothing about technology and are considering MySQL
because MySQL AB has very nice brochures.
This is *very* important becuase no-nothing management types are frequently in
a position to mandate technology choice. MySQL, like Microsoft before them,
have realized that being *perceived* as an enterprise database is, from a
sales perspective, almost as good as being one.
We will be at the convention with some card tables, some CDs and a handful of
xeroxed brochures. MySQL will have a multi-media booth with big banners and
uniforms. We need some substance to counter the glitz, and this is a very
good start.
That being said, I would like to see Alexey's other points included in the
paper. *particularly* the part about license changes and MySQL's closed
development process.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sean Chittenden | 2003-09-15 18:25:04 | Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: first draft |
Previous Message | Michael Pohl | 2003-09-15 16:05:24 | Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point? |