Re: Broken(?) 'interval' problems. [Was: ISO 8601 "Time Intervals"]

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Ron Mayer <ron(at)intervideo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Broken(?) 'interval' problems. [Was: ISO 8601 "Time Intervals"]
Date: 2003-09-10 20:21:44
Message-ID: 20030910202144.GA30774@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 11:48:58 -0700,
Ron Mayer <ron(at)intervideo(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Looks like I'll take a shot at more broadly hacking the postgresql
> time interval code. Before doing so, I wanted to ask opinions
> regarding what the "right" behavior is of various timestamp/interval
> operations.

Can you document which part of a mixed interval (with both months and
seconds parts) gets added first to a timestamp? I haven't ever run
accross anything which says which gets done first.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2003-09-10 20:35:18 Re: massive quotes?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-10 20:17:02 Re: FK type mismatches?