From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
Cc: | ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...) |
Date: | 2003-09-03 22:35:44 |
Message-ID: | 200309032235.h83MZi508511@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> >> > What does your OS want for the 3rd argument of pthread_create()? I
> >> > thought a void pointer would be OK for everyone:
> >> >
> >> > pthread_create(&thread1, NULL, (void *) func_call_1, NULL);
> >>
> >> void *(*start_routine)(void*)
> >>
> >> Here is our man page:
> >> http://lerami.lerctr.org:8458/en/man/html.3pthread/pthread_create.3pthre
> >> ad. html
> >
> > Yes, that's what I have too. What if you have the functions taking
> > (void *) rather than void. Does that make the warnings disappear?
>
> $ r cc
> cc -O -Kpthread test_thread.c -o test_thread -lsocket -lnsl
> $ ./test_thread
> Your functions are all thread-safe
> $
I have updated the code to tighten the cast:
pthread_create(&thread1, NULL, (void * (*)(void *)) func_call_1, NULL);
pthread_create(&thread2, NULL, (void * (*)(void *)) func_call_2, NULL);
The change is in CVS. Does that fix it?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-03 22:45:15 | Re: NOTICE vs WARNING |
Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2003-09-03 22:29:59 | Re: Regarding PostgreSQL Doubt |