Re: src/interfaces/cli

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: src/interfaces/cli
Date: 2003-08-08 17:42:25
Message-ID: 200308081742.h78HgPN03845@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Agreed. I have been using ecpg a little and it is really great.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Does anyone mind if I remove src/interfaces/cli? It's clearly outdated
> > and useless.
>
> Looking at the CVS history, it seems that Lockhart had an idea of
> building a CLI-spec-compatible interface on top of ecpg, but never
> went further than an initial commit.
>
> If ecpg itself now satisfies that spec then there's certainly no
> need for src/interfaces/cli ...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-08-08 17:49:53 Re: PROCEDURES was: TODO items
Previous Message Joe Conway 2003-08-08 17:38:03 Re: TODO items