| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Win32 patch to allow compilation |
| Date: | 2003-05-19 17:45:55 |
| Message-ID: | 200305191745.h4JHjtJ01411@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > I don't think 'win' is unique enough. Win32 seems the more official
> > designation.
>
> We've lived with a "win" port for years and no one complained about that.
> And what will happen when "win64" comes around? The official designation
> is Windows anyway.
OK, I have renamed win32_include to win32. I used win32 because that is
the symbol we test for in the C code, so it seemed it made sense to be
consistent. How about MSWIN? That is more unique than win. What
symbol do we test for in the C code? __mswin__?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jason Tishler | 2003-05-19 17:49:59 | Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-19 14:24:05 | Re: Heads up: 7.3.3 this Wednesday |