| From: | "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)cbbrowne(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal |
| Date: | 2003-03-14 18:51:59 |
| Message-ID: | 200303141351.59309.darcy@druid.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Friday 14 March 2003 13:24, scott.marlowe wrote:
> I vote for explode / implode as easier to type and remember than join_str.
> Also, in the SQL world, it's very likely that a back ground in
> ADA/LISP/REX/PHP is just as common as Perl or Java.
If we're voting I vote for join/split. Implode and explode just sound
unprofessional to me. Minor point but it's just preference, right?
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-03-14 18:59:58 | Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal |
| Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-03-14 18:42:11 | Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-03-14 18:59:58 | Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal |
| Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-03-14 18:42:11 | Re: SQL99 ARRAY support proposal |