Re: new procedural language - PL/R

From: cbbrowne(at)cbbrowne(dot)com
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: new procedural language - PL/R
Date: 2003-02-03 20:56:12
Message-ID: 20030203205612.4EC3C51DC4@cbbrowne.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> >>Any strong feelings on whether this is necessary for a first release?
> >
> > No. I'm not sure you'd really need triggers written in R ever ;-)
>
> Yeah, that's what I figured too.

Indeed. R sounds like it might be an interesting platform from which to
do "data mining," and in that sort of context, you're almost exclusively
reading data, so the loss of triggers would be of no great importance.

What might be "nifty" would be to have some mappings that did Clever
Transformations of Queries Into Views, particularly if that allowed
harnessing the DBMS to do some of the statistical analysis behind your
back...
--
If this was helpful, <http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=cbbrowne> rate me
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/rdbms.html
"After you've heard two eyewitness accounts of an auto accident it
makes you wonder about history." -- Bits and Pieces

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2003-02-03 21:20:09 Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System
Previous Message Dann Corbit 2003-02-03 20:15:02 Win32 and fsync()