Re: tsearch comments

Hi!

I think that this would be nice. OpenFTS is great, but i would
be great if this would be implement in real pg functions.

I think that indexim would be great if pg make it by itself.

Also it could be great if we could define order of weight of
columns.

bye Uros

I
On 28.01.2003 at 11:53:26, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
wrote:

> On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 sector119(at)mail(dot)ru wrote:
>
> > HI
> >
> > will we see sort by relevance at tsearch alpha version? :)
> >
>
> not sure. We concentrate our efforts, well, Teodor is working
> on
> better configurability of tsearch like OpenFTS does.
>
> It\\\'s not difficult to add rather naive relevance based on
> position
> of lexem in document, for example. The question is do you
like
> such
> kind of relevancy ? Real ranking support (as in OpenFTS)
> require
> separate tables to maintain coordinate information.
> We want to keep tsearch as simple as it\\\'s and now we just
add
> better and friendly configurability. Do we need complicate
> tsearch ?
> We already have OpenFTS which has most features people
> requested.
>
>
> Regards,
> Oleg
>
>
> >
>
> Regards,
> Oleg
> _____________________________________________________________
> Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
> Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
> Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
> phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to
> majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>

--
Any excuse will serve a tyrant.
-- Aesop