| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <kward(at)peerdirect(dot)com>, <patrickm(at)redhat(dot)com>, <darren(at)up(dot)hrcoxmail(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, <jrnield(at)usol(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Big 7.4 items |
| Date: | 2002-12-14 09:53:03 |
| Message-ID: | 20021214175205.U75528-100000@houston.familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > I think in either way, it's clear that they need to be in the main CVS, in
> > order for it to get up to speed.
>
> Why's that?
Because until replication is in CVS, it won't be used, tested and improved
and developed as fast...
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Al Sutton | 2002-12-14 12:51:13 | Re: Big 7.4 items - Replication |
| Previous Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2002-12-14 09:24:38 | Big 7.4 items : table attachment |