Re: Changing Column Order (Was Re: MySQL vs PostgreSQL.)

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Antti Haapala <antti(dot)haapala(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Changing Column Order (Was Re: MySQL vs PostgreSQL.)
Date: 2002-10-12 15:45:13
Message-ID: 20021012154513.GA12337@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 12:43:37 +0300,
Antti Haapala <antti(dot)haapala(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
>
> > I cannot think of any reason why changing column order should be
> > implemented in Postgres. Seems like a waste of time/more code bloat for
> > something which is strictly asthetic.
>
> What about copy? AFAIK, copy doesn't allow column names being specified,
> so it's not purely aesthetic...

The SQL COPY command does (at least in 7.3). The \copy psql command
doesn't seem to allow this though.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Smarzewski 2002-10-12 16:31:50 certified installer/administrator
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-12 14:37:32 Re: MySQL vs PostgreSQL.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Darko Prenosil 2002-10-12 18:58:53 Re: [HACKERS] MySQL vs PostgreSQL.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-12 14:45:32 Re: Script to compute random page cost

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Darko Prenosil 2002-10-12 18:58:53 Re: [HACKERS] MySQL vs PostgreSQL.
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2002-10-12 14:46:07 cursor based result sets not updateable