Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chris Miles <chris_pg002(at)psychofx(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database
Date: 2002-10-12 15:11:53
Message-ID: 200210121511.g9CFBs619940@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Chris Miles wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:09:55AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > We also don't recommend NFS directories because the NFS file behavior is
> > not 100% the same as a local file system.
>
> Can you comment on what the incompatabities are? (related to PostgreSQL
> only).
>
> We currently run PostgreSQL on Linux servers with the data on dedicated
> Netapp filers over NFS. We have had no problems so far and performance
> is very acceptable.
>
> If there is something I need to watch out for, I would like to know.

Good question. It is my understanding that fsync, locking, and the
order of writes is not guaranteed in NFS like it is for local file
systems. I question how well it would handle any of the failure modes
that local file systems can withstand.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Miles 2002-10-12 15:14:13 Replicating MSSQL to PostgreSQL possible?
Previous Message Chris Miles 2002-10-12 15:06:10 Re: Multiple backends on a single physical database