| From: | Jason Tishler <jason(at)tishler(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Labhard <ince(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pgsql-Cygwin <pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL unsuitable for large datasets? |
| Date: | 2002-09-03 13:27:32 |
| Message-ID: | 20020903132732.GB1504@tishler.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-cygwin |
Michael,
Please keep your replies on-list.
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 08:05:57AM -0700, Michael Labhard wrote:
> Thanks for the tip.
You are welcome.
> Interesting idea but I monitored the process and found it to be using
> around 200 MB of memory already,
Maybe Cygwin's heap is not quite equivalent to "monitored process
memory"?
> so I'm not sure what to make of the reference you sent.
Note that this suggestion has help many others with Cygwin out-of-memory
problems.
> Unfortunately I'm not in a position to try a test either.
Hmm...
> Appreciate the interest.
Again, you are welcome. However, it's sad that you are not even willing
to try my suggestion -- especially, since it is so easy to do so.
Nevertheless, you are the one with the itch, so you can choose to
scratch it or not.
Jason
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Labhard | 2002-09-03 16:40:28 | Re: PostgreSQL unsuitable for large datasets? |
| Previous Message | joek hondius | 2002-09-02 09:32:32 | Re: PG on Win2K |