| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Impending freeze |
| Date: | 2002-09-02 21:55:22 |
| Message-ID: | 20020902185438.A2186-100000@hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> So my take is that anything that needs initdb doesn't get in after
> beta1, unless it's a "must fix" bug. What have we got in the queue
> that would require system catalog changes?
Agreed, but, have we ever done such when it *wasn't* required? I know in
the past its always been with hestitation that such has been done, or at
least that is how I've felt it come across ...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-09-02 22:25:54 | Future of --enable-recode? |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2002-09-02 20:37:55 | Re: reindex of toast tables |