Re: Default privileges for new databases (was Re: Can't import

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ron Snyder <snyder(at)roguewave(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Default privileges for new databases (was Re: Can't import
Date: 2002-09-02 02:52:33
Message-ID: 200209020252.g822qXc21767@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


OK, we are rolling out schemas in 7.3. We better figure out if we have
the best solution for this.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Have we addressed this? I don't think so.
>
> No, it's not done yet. My inclination is
>
> * Template1 has temp table creation and schema creation disabled
> (disallowed to world) by default.
>
> * CREATE DATABASE sets up new databases with temp table creation allowed
> to world and schema creation allowed to DB owner only (regardless of
> what the template database had). The owner can adjust this default
> afterwards if he doesn't like it.
>
> It would be nice to lock down the public schema in template1 too, but I
> see no good way to do that, because CREATE DATABASE can't readily fiddle
> with protections *inside* the database --- the only games we can play
> are with the protections stored in the pg_database row itself. So
> public's permissions are going to be inherited from the template
> database, and that means template1's public has to be writable.
>
> Objections anyone?
>
> regards, tom lane
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mlw 2002-09-02 02:54:44 Re: contrib/ intarray, ltree, intagg broken(?) by array
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-02 02:51:52 Re: Think I see a btree vacuuming bug