| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Ron Snyder <snyder(at)roguewave(dot)com>, Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Open 7.3 items |
| Date: | 2002-08-07 22:27:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20020807192641.T68908-100000@mail1.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > OK, here is the request for vote. Do we want:
> >
> > > 1) the old secondary passwords re-added
> > > 2) the new prefixing of the database name to the username when enabled
> > > 3) do nothing
> >
> > I vote for 2b), username(at)database ...
>
> Yes, the format was going to be my second vote, dbname.username or
> username(at)dbname(dot) Guess I will not need that vote. ;-)
Actually, I kinda like dbname.username myself ... it means that wne you do
a SELECT of the pg_shadow file, it can be sorted in a useful manner (ie.
grouped by database)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-08-07 22:46:52 | Today's Downtime ... |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-08-07 22:02:31 | Re: Open 7.3 items |