Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, mail(at)joeconway(dot)com, lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Date: 2002-08-06 02:08:41
Message-ID: 20020806.110841.126777603.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I don't have trouble with 128, but other than standards compliance, I
> can't see many people getting >64 names.

Don't forget that 128 is for *bytes*, not for characters(this is still
ture with 7.3). In CJK(Chinese, Japanese and Korean) single character
can eat up to 3 bytes if the encoding is UTF-8.
--
Tatsuo Ishii

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-08-06 02:27:50 New manual chapters
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-08-06 01:49:04 Re: PostgreSQL 7.2.1 on NetWare