| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks |
| Date: | 2002-08-02 06:55:01 |
| Message-ID: | 20020802035325.J83339-100000@mail1.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > > With FUNC_MAX_ARGS=16:
> > > (average = 28.6 seconds)
> > > With FUNC_MAX_ARGS=32:
> > > (average = 29.15 seconds)
>
> That is almost a 2 percent cost. Shall we challenge someone to get us
> back 2 percent from somewhere before the 7.3 release? Optimizing a hot
> spot might do it...
The other side of the coin ... have you, in the past, gained enough
performance to allow us a 2% slip for v7.3?
Someone mentioned that the SQL spec called for a 128byte NAMELENTH ... is
there similar for FUNC_MAX_ARGS that we aren't adhering to? Or is that
one semi-arbitrary?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Curt Sampson | 2002-08-02 06:55:57 | Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-08-02 06:52:21 | Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? |