| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |
| Date: | 2002-07-05 13:05:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20020705100444.X22387-100000@mail1.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> >> At some point, we may have to modify our name and start at 1.0 again.
>
> > Ya, that's it ... we've only spent, what, 8 years now making 'PostgreSQL'
> > known, so let's change the name *just* so that we can start at 1.0 and
> > face a new challenge of getting ppl to recognize the name?
>
> I've heard a number of people opine that we should go back to just plain
> 'Postgres', which is pronounceable by the uninitiate, and besides which
I can never figure this out ... what is so difficult about 'Postgres-Q-L'?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Walzl | 2002-07-05 13:24:54 | Null in the where-clause |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-07-05 12:48:44 | Re: Should next release by 8.0 (Was: Re: [GENERAL] I am |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-05 14:14:53 | Re: BETWEEN Node & DROP COLUMN |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-07-05 12:48:44 | Re: Should next release by 8.0 (Was: Re: [GENERAL] I am |