From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |
Date: | 2002-07-05 04:01:32 |
Message-ID: | 200207050401.g6541Wk01258@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> >> At some point, we may have to modify our name and start at 1.0 again.
>
> > Ya, that's it ... we've only spent, what, 8 years now making 'PostgreSQL'
> > known, so let's change the name *just* so that we can start at 1.0 and
> > face a new challenge of getting ppl to recognize the name?
>
> I've heard a number of people opine that we should go back to just plain
> 'Postgres', which is pronounceable by the uninitiate, and besides which
> that's what we use informally most of the time. 'PostgreSQL' is about
> as marketing-unfriendly a name as you could easily find...
I personally agree.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Clift | 2002-07-05 04:13:10 | Re: Should next release by 8.0 (Was: Re: [GENERAL] I am being |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-05 03:59:23 | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Clift | 2002-07-05 04:13:10 | Re: Should next release by 8.0 (Was: Re: [GENERAL] I am being |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-07-05 03:59:23 | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |