Re: Roadmap for a Win32 port

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Roadmap for a Win32 port
Date: 2002-06-18 01:00:46
Message-ID: 200206180100.g5I10k610197@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jan Wieck wrote:
> > And pg_ctl will be run with a symlink to postmaster like postgres,
> > right? Makes sense.
>
> No symlink. Windows doesn't have symlinks, the "link" stuff you
> see is just some file with a special meaning for the Windows
> explorer. There is absolutely no support built into the OS. They
> really haven't learned alot since the DOS times, when they added
> "." and ".." entries to directories to "look" similar to UNIX.
> Actually, they never really understood what a hardlink is in the
> first place, so why do you expect them to know how to implement
> symbolic ones?
>
> It will be at least another copy of the postmaster (dot exe).

Yea, I just liked the idea of the postmaster binary somehow reporting
the postmaster status. Seems it is in a better position to do that than
a shell script.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2002-06-18 01:05:34 Re: Roadmap for a Win32 port
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2002-06-18 00:10:02 Re: Default privileges for new databases (was Re: Can't import large objects in most recent cvs)