| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
| Cc: | mail(at)joeconway(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware |
| Date: | 2002-04-08 03:52:02 |
| Message-ID: | 20020408125202S.t-ishii@sra.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> > No objection here, but can we wrap the change in #ifdef MULTIBYTE so
> > there's no effect for people who don't use MULTIBYTE?
>
> That opens up the standard set of issues about "what if your server is
> MULTIBYTE but your libpq is not?" It seems risky to me.
I have committed changes to the current source (without MULTIBYTE
ifdes). Will change t.2-stable tree soon.
I also added some careful handlings for memory allocation errors and
changed some questionable codes useing direct ASCII values 92 instead
of '\\' for example.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Swan | 2002-04-08 04:09:07 | Re: timeout implementation issues |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-08 03:33:30 | Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-08 04:40:56 | Re: unknownin/out patch (was [HACKERS] PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware) |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-04-08 02:43:20 | Re: unknownin/out patch (was [HACKERS] PQescapeBytea is |