Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, Jason Earl <jason(dot)earl(at)simplot(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>, alavoor <alavoor(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Date: 2002-01-21 18:59:39
Message-ID: 200201211859.g0LIxd328352@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> > 3) encourages BSD license usage
>
> And here it is! As hidden as this is, it is the problem. I do not think
> you have unanimous agreement, else these arguments would not keep coming
> up. As long as you are "promoting" BSD you will invite vigorous debate
> with the GPL camp. For the sake of the peace and respect for the GPL
> camp, I think the politics and religion of license should be relegated
> to personal opinion.

I merely meant that we should show BSD as a viable license, rather than
make excuses for it by saying it was chosen by someone long ago. We
_do_ need to promote it within our own source tree.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mlw 2002-01-21 18:59:55 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Previous Message Sam Cao 2002-01-21 18:44:42 Foreign Key?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mlw 2002-01-21 18:59:55 Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-01-21 18:45:08 Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems