XFS File systems and PostgreSQL

From: bruc(at)stone(dot)congenomics(dot)com (Robert E(dot) Bruccoleri)
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: XFS File systems and PostgreSQL
Date: 2001-05-02 22:45:16
Message-ID: 200105022245.SAA33793@stone.congenomics.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I have been using PostgreSQL and XFS file systems on SGI's for many
years, and PostgreSQL is fast. Dumping and loading 100GB of table
files takes less than one day elapsed (provided there is no other
activity on that database -- large amounts of transactional activity
will slow things down). I always turn off fsync. Most of my experience has
been with 6.5.3, although I've been using 7.1 and I don't see much
of a difference in performance.

I don't know if the Linux version of XFS is substantially different
than the SGI version, but XFS is a wonderful filesystem to use and
administer (at least on SGI's).

+----------------------------------+------------------------------------+
| Robert E. Bruccoleri, Ph.D. | Phone: 609 737 6383 |
| President, Congenomics, Inc. | Fax: 609 737 7528 |
| 114 W Franklin Ave, Suite K1,4,5 | email: bruc(at)acm(dot)org |
| P.O. Box 314 | URL: http://www.congen.com/~bruc |
| Pennington, NJ 08534 | |
+----------------------------------+------------------------------------+

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2001-05-02 22:57:23 Re: Collation order for btree-indexable datatypes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-05-02 22:32:39 Re: \c connects as another user instead I want in psql