Re: WAL and commit_delay

From: Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL and commit_delay
Date: 2001-02-17 23:30:12
Message-ID: 20010217183012.A24141@rcfile.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 17 Feb 2001 at 17:56 (-0500), Tom Lane wrote:

[snipped]

| Is anyone out there running a 2.4 Linux kernel? Would you try pgbench
| with current sources, commit_delay=0, -B at least 1024, no -F, and see
| how the results change when pg_fsync is made to call fdatasync instead
| of fsync? (It's in src/backend/storage/file/fd.c)

I've not run this requested test, but glibc-2.2 provides this bit
of code for fdatasync, so it /appears/ to me that kernel version
will not affect the test case.

[glibc-2.2/sysdeps/generic/fdatasync.c]

int
fdatasync (int fildes)
{
return fsync (fildes);
}

hth.
brent

--
"We want to help, but we wouldn't want to deprive you of a valuable
learning experience."
http://openbsd.org/mail.html

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Myers 2001-02-17 23:35:15 Re: Microsecond sleeps with select()
Previous Message Matthew Kirkwood 2001-02-17 23:18:37 Linux 2.2 vs 2.4