Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers.

* Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> [000124 10:54] wrote:
> Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> writes:
> > This morning I cvs'd made, installed, moved data->data2, initdb, started
> > up postmaster, reloaded data (this worked!), then tried the join. It's a
> > big one, so I thought I might as well stress it at the same time, and did
> > a regression test.
>
> > Anything I could try to narrow the problem down?
>
> Hmm. Why don't you try running the parallel regression test, to see
> if that blows up too?

I just ran the regression tests as best as I know how:

~/pgcvs/pgsql/src/test/regress % gmake runcheck
~/pgcvs/pgsql/src/test/regress % grep FAIL run_check.out
test int2 ... FAILED
test int4 ... FAILED
test float8 ... FAILED
sequential test geometry ... FAILED
~/pgcvs/pgsql/src/test/regress %

no int2/int4? yipes!

I ran it 10 more times and one time I got:
test constraints ... FAILED

but i got no weird parse errors or anything from the backend.

Have you been able to find any weirdness with the fix I posted,
or is this more likely an issue with Patrick Welche's setup?

-Alfred