Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump disaster

> On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > I thought these patches should not have been applied without more
> > > peer review, and now I'm sure of it. I recommend reverting 'em.
> >
> > Can we give the submitter a few days to address the issue?
>
> Considering that we haven't even gone BETA yet, I *heavily* second this
> ... Alfred, so far as I've seen, has a) spent alot of time on these
> patches and b) tried to address any concerns as they've been presented
> concerning them...
>
> IMHO, if we hadn't commit'd the patches, we wouldn't have found the bug,
> and getting feedback on the pathes without applying them, so far, has been
> about as painful as pulling teeth ...

Yes, he has worked very hard on this. That's why I want to give him
some time to address the issues. In fact, he already has replied, and I
am sure a dialog will resolve the issue.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026