On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 14:29:58 +0100, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
>> Now that FSM
>> covers free btree index pages this access pattern might be highly
>> nonsequential.
>
>I had considered implementing a mode where the index doesn't keep trying
>to reuse space that was freed by earlier deletes.
Or maybe an FSM function a la "Give me a free page near this one"?
Servus
Manfred