| From: | "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: log_duration is redundant, no? |
| Date: | 2006-09-08 20:51:42 |
| Message-ID: | 1d4e0c10609081351g62dcc802j45a84c0839283bf2@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom,
On 9/8/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> It seems like we should either remove the separate log_duration boolean
> or make it work as he suggests. I'm leaning to the second answer now.
Do you want me to propose a patch or do you prefer to work on it
yourself? If so, do we keep the log_duration name or do we change it
to log_all_duration or another more appropriate name?
I attached the little patch I use to apply on our packages. I can work
on it to make it apply to HEAD and update the documentation.
I suppose we should also change the FE/BE protocol logging accordingly
but ISTM you already planned to change it for other reasons.
--
Guillaume
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| postgresql-log-duration.patch | text/x-patch | 1.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-08 20:59:02 | Re: log_duration is redundant, no? |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-09-08 20:49:49 | Re: Fixed length data types issue |