Re: A little pg_dump patch

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A little pg_dump patch
Date: 2011-09-19 15:44:13
Message-ID: 1d07ac99930ec8d28100d033fa39c66d@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

>> I wrote this little patch, becuse my customer doesn't want to have
>> comments on the production db. It's not my choice
>
> Then use pg_restore --use-list to filter them out, and you won't need a

Or just strip them out after the fact with a little bit of SQL, e.g.

DELETE FROM pg_description WHERE objoid > 50000;

(test first, your system may vary and 50000 may not work)

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201109191143
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAk53YzsACgkQvJuQZxSWSsgA0wCguiURJI4Hneu7Dn+vBtcEOLsR
/OcAn35ujJCWhf2tM3a1J2yek0uddF1X
=wc3x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2011-09-19 15:46:27 Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor
Previous Message Vitor Reus 2011-09-19 15:43:55 Re: CUDA Sorting